search

vert-x3 / issues

Apache License 2.0
37 stars 5 forks source link

CoAP protocol support #187

Open rtv2222 opened 8 years ago

rtv2222 commented 8 years ago

Unreliable and low bandwidth networks require connection less modes of operation.

CoAP protocol support in Vert.x would be a great feature.

vietj commented 8 years ago

@rtv2222 would you be interested to contribute ?

rtv2222 commented 8 years ago

yes.

-Rajesh

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Julien Viet notifications@github.com wrote:

@rtv2222 https://github.com/rtv2222 would you be interested to contribute ?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/vert-x3/issues/issues/187#issuecomment-253209406, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMv63Ho5UBkQy-ZrIoUVeJlKTG-pCFLGks5qzNzagaJpZM4J0xjv .

vietj commented 8 years ago

@rtv2222 have you already started to investigate ? you may want to read this issue https://github.com/vert-x3/issues/issues/187

thiagogcm commented 7 years ago

Any progress on this issue?

vietj commented 7 years ago

no we don't have any contributor on this topic

rtv2222 commented 7 years ago

I have read up on the RFC as well as looked up other open source implementations. However, I'd appreciate pointers on how to get started.

vietj commented 7 years ago

do you mind sending a mail to the vertx-dev group to discuss this ?

vietj commented 6 years ago

anyone up to contribute this ?

wem commented 6 years ago

Hi

I can't promise, but maybe it's possible for me to do a contribution on this. I can tell you more within a week.

vietj commented 6 years ago

that would be great, server or client ?

I think client makes more sense for building IoT gateways with vertx.

wem commented 6 years ago

I was thinking about to build it on top of califorium-core https://www.eclipse.org/californium. It's lightweight too as i saw and it's an eclipse project as well. How looks this idea to you? They have both, server and client against the same API (one Maven dependency). Therefore i think it would be possible to make both.

Later it maybe can make sense to implement the LWM2M for it (and the MQTT as well). So Vert.x provides the most famous IoT standards

vietj commented 6 years ago

@wem vertx like califorium uses Netty, so that should be doable given the netty versions are compatible

wem commented 6 years ago

Hello Sorry for my late reply. Unfortunately it's not possible for me to contribute on this issue because lack of time. I will go with MQTT as IoT protocol.