Closed ShreckYe closed 1 year ago
can you use vertx-unit instead of vertx-junit5 for the tests for the sake of consistency ?
OK, I will try to adapt them.
@vietj Hi Julien. It's done. Please review.
I pinged kotlin users on our discord to give eventually feedback on the PR
There's some pretty neat additions proposed here that should help reduce boilerplate in most kotlin projects 👍
Some updates with the documentation and code samples how to use the proposed new vertx kotlin extensions would be really helpful
There's some pretty neat additions proposed here that should help reduce boilerplate in most kotlin projects +1
Thank you.
I don't fully understand why the CI tests failed. Is it because that the "kotlin" source set in "vertx-lang-kotlin" is overriden by generated code?
do we have consensus on this PR ?
I don't know what is wrong with tests not passing, have you tried to build locally ?
The Maven test
phases pass locally. I moved Tuple.kt to the java
source directory. Maybe this will work.
Superseded by https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-lang-kotlin/pull/253
Motivation:
Hi, Vert.x Maintainers. We have been developing our projects in Kotlin with the Vert.x toolkit as the core of the backend. It's been quite smooth and this project provides a lot of useful extensions in Kotlin. During our development, we came up with a few more common extensions in our shared code repository, which we thought could be ported back to this project and made universally available.
We have tried to pick the less opinionated code from our common project in this PR so it's generally useful to most developers using Vert.x in Kotlin. If there is any code that is not appropriate to be added back to this repository, just feel free to remove it or make further changes as it suits your needs. Or if there is none to be added, just close this PR.
Thank you.