search

vert-x3 / vertx-service-proxy

EventBus Proxy generation
Apache License 2.0
66 stars 58 forks source link

Added support for enum with custom constructor #115

Closed cvgaviao closed 2 years ago

cvgaviao commented 4 years ago

https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-codegen/issues/295

Signed-off-by: Cristiano V. Gavião cvgaviao@gmail.com

Motivation:

Explain here the context, and why you're making that change, what is the problem you're trying to solve.

Conformance:

Your commits should be signed and you should have signed the Eclipse Contributor Agreement as explained in https://github.com/eclipse/vert.x/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md Please also make sure you adhere to the code style guidelines: https://github.com/vert-x3/wiki/wiki/Vert.x-code-style-guidelines

cvgaviao commented 4 years ago

@vietj, it is ready and I also added some tests

vietj commented 4 years ago

I think we need the test to be in codegen TCK and have an implementation for vertx-rx as well.

cvgaviao commented 4 years ago

I think we need the test to be in codegen TCK and have an implementation for vertx-rx as well.

@vietj , there is no use of any enum in the rx codegen projects, I run it's building and all tests have passed.

So, why this and vertx-codegen PR for custom enums should wait for vertx-rx?

vietj commented 4 years ago

there should be an example in TCK that uses an enum mapped with a mapper and the vertx-rx should handle it fine (I think there is nothing to do) but nevertheless such test should be in TCK, because some other impls like ES4X will need this.

On 5 Jun 2020, at 14:20, Cristiano Gavião notifications@github.com wrote:

I think we need the test to be in codegen TCK and have an implementation for vertx-rx as well.

@vietj https://github.com/vietj , there is no use of any enum in the rx codegen projects, I run it's building and all tests have passed.

So, why this and vertx-codegen PR for custom enums should wait for vertx-rx?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-service-proxy/pull/115#issuecomment-639447462, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABXDCUJXOIZKOSNZOKS5HLRVDPJRANCNFSM4NNBIRTQ.

cvgaviao commented 4 years ago

there should be an example in TCK that uses an enum mapped with a mapper and the vertx-rx should handle it fine (I think there is nothing to do) but nevertheless such test should be in TCK, because some other impls like ES4X will need this.

Well, I think I did it.