I confirm that this contribution is made under the terms of the license found in the root directory of this repository's source tree and that I have the authority necessary to make this contribution on behalf of its copyright owner.
Fixes #811 by adding auth_clients as a param to ContainerCluster.
If auth_clients are passed to ApplicationPackageand cluster(s) with auth_clients are defined, and they differ, the auth_clients passed to ApplicationPackage will override those passed to the Cluster.
Feel like we are moving a bit way from the jinja-template approach now, by moving more to the classes of the elements.
Would appreciate perspective on whether we should attempt to move back more towards jinja-template.
Triggered cloud integration-tests from local, and all passed. ✅
I confirm that this contribution is made under the terms of the license found in the root directory of this repository's source tree and that I have the authority necessary to make this contribution on behalf of its copyright owner.
Fixes #811 by adding
auth_clients
as a param toContainerCluster
. If auth_clients are passed toApplicationPackage
and cluster(s) with auth_clients are defined, and they differ, the auth_clients passed toApplicationPackage
will override those passed to theCluster
.Feel like we are moving a bit way from the jinja-template approach now, by moving more to the classes of the elements. Would appreciate perspective on whether we should attempt to move back more towards jinja-template.
Triggered cloud integration-tests from local, and all passed. ✅