Add proxy for Dutch channels for viewers outside of Holland

veveykocute / xot-uzg

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/xot-uzg

0 stars 0 forks source link

Add proxy for Dutch channels for viewers outside of Holland #421

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

There is a proxy setting added for BBC channels. Could you also add a proxy 
setting for all Dutch channels? Most of them need an IP from Holland to work.

I run:
XMBC 12.0
Windows 7
XOT-UZG 3.3.3

Original issue reported on code.google.com by markdar...@gmail.com on 19 Mar 2013 at 3:15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Ok, that sounds fair. But I will look into a more generic way of setting 
proxies for each possible channel. It will be in 3.3.5, as 3.3.4 is done and 
just waiting for test results.

Original comment by basrie...@gmail.com on 19 Mar 2013 at 7:41

Changed state: Accepted

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Issue 476 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by basrie...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2013 at 4:31

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I guess there are 3 options:

- Proxy per channel, but that would lead to a lot of settings. For example: 
each BBC channel will need to have it's proxy configured separately.

- Proxy per language: probably OK for Dutch, but there are also channels 
without languages and many channels that have a English language. So that might 
not work.

- A fixed number of proxies (10 or so) that you link to channels. Problem is 
that they will appear as Proxy 1, Proxy 2,.....Proxy 10 (this is an XBMC 
limitation), which makes linking harder. 

If there are other suggestions, please feel free to let me know.

Original comment by basrie...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2013 at 8:07

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I finished a version with proxies per channel. If anyone is interested, please 
let me know and I will drop a DropBox link to you.

Original comment by basrie...@gmail.com on 29 Oct 2013 at 9:31

Changed state: Started

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I am willing to try and give some results back

Original comment by markdar...@gmail.com on 29 Oct 2013 at 9:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Willing to give it a try! But won't be until the weekend...

Original comment by r...@outsourced.nl on 29 Oct 2013 at 9:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Did you both receive my e-mail 2 days ago?

Original comment by basrie...@gmail.com on 31 Oct 2013 at 7:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Hi,

I did receive your email. I will do some testing this coming Tuesday. We
are on holiday here in Belgium this weekend.

Original comment by markdar...@gmail.com on 1 Nov 2013 at 9:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

And? Any comments on the current solution?

Original comment by basrie...@gmail.com on 7 Nov 2013 at 9:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I am using XOT-Uzg.v3 v3.3.7 on Raspbmc (raspberry pi).  I would like to test 
these changes as well, if possible.  Would it be straightforward to have a 
solution where the user could choose between 
(1) a single proxy specified for all channels, or
(2) a proxy for each channel.

Or alternatively, have a "default" proxy, but allow a channel to override the 
default with an individual one.

Original comment by chris.b...@gmail.com on 13 Nov 2013 at 12:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

This feature has been implemented in 3.4.0

Original comment by basrie...@gmail.com on 16 Feb 2014 at 8:13

Changed state: Done