Closed ndkhanh360 closed 2 years ago
Hi,
This is a good point which I am explaining in more detail in an upcoming version of the paper. Both ways become similar in practice. When unrolling the recursive equation 7 through different layers you obtain an equation of the form:
x_i^{l+1} = \sum_i (x_i^l - x_j^l) \phix^l(m{ij}^l)\phi_v^l + sum_i (x_i^{l-1} - x_j^{l-1}) \phix^{l-1}(m{ij}^{l-1})\phi_v^{l} \phi_v^{l-1} + ... + sum_i (x_i^0 - x_j^0) \phix^0(m{ij}^0)\prod_l \phi_v^l(h_l) + \prod_l \phi_v^l(·)*v_0
Notice the update in every layer becomes the sum of all previous coordinate updates (x_i^l - x_j^l) for all layers "l" plus the initial velocity v^0 multiplied by a scalar value depending on the given layer "l". Therefore, in practice, we can just sum the original initial velocity v^0 multiplied by an inferred scalar value in every layer. I am adding an explanation of this in the Appendix.
Best, Victor
Dear author,
I have a question about the updates of velocity in your N-body experiments. According to equation (7), both the velocity and coordinates are updated after each EGCL layer:
However, in the corresponding
E_GCL_vel
class, only the coordinates are updated while the velocity is kept the same:I was wondering if there is any motivation or reasoning for this or whether this helps achieve better results.
Thank you!