vgteam / sv-genotyping-paper

MIT License
31 stars 6 forks source link

Missing scripts/data #5

Closed jmonlong closed 5 years ago

jmonlong commented 5 years ago

There are a few links/scripts that are still missing. @glennhickey could you add them?

glennhickey commented 5 years ago

This should be resolved now. Why are we using GIAB 0.5 and not 0.6? This contradicts the manuscript text and doesn't seem to make sense.

glennhickey commented 5 years ago

Whatever the case, the good news is that .5 and .6 are very similar. We just have to make sure the text is consistent with this repo. If we are indeed using .5, will have to double check the manuscript to make sure it all makes sense. (ie not sure the parental calls are ./. in .5 like we allude to in the text).

jmonlong commented 5 years ago

In the end we had ran the other genotypers on v0.5 in case we wanted to compare with the preprint that used 0.5. As you said the numbers are very similar. I updated the text/numbers.

In 0.5, some variants have ./. on the 3 individuals and some others are parental calls where HG002 is 0/0. I updated the relevant sentence in the methods sections.

This is in PR 91

(Thanks for completing the missing sections!)