search

vhbb / cmssw

CMS Offline Software
cms-sw.github.io/cmssw
4 stars 5 forks source link

Electron SF available #495

Open bianchini opened 8 years ago

bianchini commented 8 years ago

See https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/egamma/1753.html SF available at https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/EgammaIDRecipesRun2

dcurry09 commented 8 years ago

Created pull request # 503: https://github.com/vhbb/cmssw/pull/503

Scale factors for MVAID WP80 and 90 have been added. ttH group has been contacted about 80X electron trigger SFs.

bianchini commented 8 years ago

Any news about the trigger SF ?

dcurry09 commented 8 years ago

From ttH the single electron SF for Data are not ready yet. If we need for next few days we could produce our own ele25 data trigger efficiencies and change our single electron trigger at the same time.

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:57 PM, bianchini notifications@github.com wrote:

Any news about the trigger SF ?

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/vhbb/cmssw/issues/495#issuecomment-234280148, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEJ5mlHXeS0ofaHwSUSjF_TSPy8heMVuks5qX4jKgaJpZM4JN-4O .

David Curry

Physics Department CERN B8 R-031 || University of Florida, NPB 1218 curry@phys.ufl.edu 076 291 0492

bianchini commented 8 years ago

https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/top/2284.html and https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/top/2285.html

perrozzi commented 8 years ago

do I understand that the electron trigger SF are still missing? (MVAID sohuld be here https://github.com/vhbb/cmssw/pull/504)

dcurry09 commented 8 years ago

Yes, they were in the process of being calculated by Chris Palmer as of last week. I will commit as soon as they become available.

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:39 AM, perrozzi notifications@github.com wrote:

do I understand that the electron trigger SF are still missing? (MVAID sohuld be here #504 https://github.com/vhbb/cmssw/pull/504)

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/vhbb/cmssw/issues/495#issuecomment-243712428, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEJ5mnZz8JX-HOZF3Q7NszpLmmUXOq4Hks5qlUvngaJpZM4JN-4O .

David Curry

Physics Department CERN B8 R-031 || University of Florida, NPB 1218 curry@phys.ufl.edu 076 291 0492

jpata commented 8 years ago

hello, news?

GLP90 commented 8 years ago

The Json for the electrons trigger have been produced. However, after some first cross-checks, it seems the efficiency values are too low. So I think one would need to correct for this and reproduce the Json.

bianchini commented 8 years ago

Ciao, I see that we have these two set of "gsfToReco" SF: https://github.com/vhbb/cmssw/blob/vhbbHeppy80X/VHbbAnalysis/Heppy/data/leptonSF/ScaleFactor_GsfElectronToRECO_passingTrigWP80.json https://github.com/vhbb/cmssw/blob/vhbbHeppy80X/VHbbAnalysis/Heppy/data/leptonSF/ScaleFactor_GsfElectronToRECO_passingTrigWP90.json Do people remember what they are for?

What we are instead missing are the pt-independent (but eta-dependent) SF for GSF tracking recommended for 80X: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/EgammaIDRecipesRun2#Electron_efficiencies_and_scale Do you agree?

bianchini commented 8 years ago

A new set of SF for the GSF tracking is here: https://github.com/vhbb/cmssw/pull/556