Open ZachCook opened 11 years ago
Since we're using ( and suggesting ) CCV on the smart table, I'm going to say this isn't worth the time. The Smart table software is just too slow.
Please note that not all SMART devices work with CCV, including the one in my MSCI 343 class. While agreed that Smart2Tuio is slower than we'd like, it is the only option on some machines.
Very well. Sorry. Is this actually something we should spend time on, though?
This is due to inadequate sampling rate of the Smart2Tuio executable that provides the TouchSource.SMART tuio events.
We should be able to change Smart2Tuio itself to fix this.
We could also try interpolating touchpoints, at the cost of latency equal to that of the time between actual touchpoints. This has the benefit of being able to have all touch sources equally smooth.