Closed istvanrath closed 12 years ago
The current implementation has two questionable additions to the specification:
Any of the above behaviour may seem unwanted/erroneous/smelly to you. Discuss! (or close the issue :D)
The only thing I would like to point out is that I thought it would be a good idea to introduce our own class for PatternGroups, instead of using plain Set
I agree that an own class for groups is a good idea. However, I believe that it should be handled apart from the matcher factory registry. Actually, it should be each pattern group's responsibility to refresh their included patterns by calling the registry and the registry should remain independent of group objects and work only as a way to retieve patterns to create a group.
Ready for use in #182
As per https://trac.inf.mit.bme.hu/VIATRA/wiki/IncQuery2/Meetings/20120611:
This is an additional task related to #14.