Closed SimonYoungtree closed 9 months ago
I had that too. After deleting the dess context flow and restarting Node Red, the discharge current has increased a lot
At the moment your target SOC is set to 31% with the battery SOC at 31.2%
Please allow the system to run for a while. We'll take a closer look when needed.
Target is now 56%, actual soc 42%. Charge power is now 220W. Isn't that way too low for a 12 kwh battery? Half hour to go
Last hour, the target was 69%, but the current was way too low to achieve this and reached only less than 50 at the end of the hour. It's target is now 57%, 15 minutes to go, 50% soc and 200 W charge power. Something is going wrong.
Target is 11%, estimated discharge is about 4.5 kWh, but the discharge power is about 800W. It will not achieve it's soc target in this way. (sorry, it will not show the entire screenshots)
Totally agreeing that it looks like there is a problem right now. Investigating the cause.
Together we make it great!
Can you add the following to your flow?
[
{
"id": "11c0695b7819894f",
"type": "group",
"z": "89827d782ab51de2",
"name": "Store battery capacity",
"style": {
"label": true
},
"nodes": [
"e9a9bebc9c4732d0",
"b48a8f507e14330a",
"b68ffdbbf4152cf3",
"8d723ea6a3f644bc"
],
"x": 54,
"y": 819,
"w": 1092,
"h": 82
},
{
"id": "e9a9bebc9c4732d0",
"type": "change",
"z": "89827d782ab51de2",
"g": "11c0695b7819894f",
"name": "battery capacity",
"rules": [
{
"t": "set",
"p": "payload",
"pt": "msg",
"to": "dess.options.b_max",
"tot": "flow"
}
],
"action": "",
"property": "",
"from": "",
"to": "",
"reg": false,
"x": 260,
"y": 860,
"wires": [
[
"b68ffdbbf4152cf3"
]
]
},
{
"id": "b48a8f507e14330a",
"type": "victron-output-custom",
"z": "89827d782ab51de2",
"g": "11c0695b7819894f",
"service": "com.victronenergy.settings",
"path": "/Settings/DynamicEss/BatteryCapacity",
"serviceObj": {
"service": "com.victronenergy.settings",
"name": "com.victronenergy.settings"
},
"pathObj": {
"path": "/Settings/DynamicEss/BatteryCapacity",
"name": "/Settings/DynamicEss/BatteryCapacity",
"type": "number"
},
"name": "",
"onlyChanges": false,
"x": 880,
"y": 860,
"wires": []
},
{
"id": "b68ffdbbf4152cf3",
"type": "change",
"z": "89827d782ab51de2",
"g": "11c0695b7819894f",
"name": "to number",
"rules": [
{
"t": "set",
"p": "payload",
"pt": "msg",
"to": "$number(payload)",
"tot": "jsonata"
}
],
"action": "",
"property": "",
"from": "",
"to": "",
"reg": false,
"x": 450,
"y": 860,
"wires": [
[
"b48a8f507e14330a"
]
]
},
{
"id": "8d723ea6a3f644bc",
"type": "link in",
"z": "89827d782ab51de2",
"g": "11c0695b7819894f",
"name": "link in 1",
"links": [
"0a258a4a88409834"
],
"x": 95,
"y": 860,
"wires": [
[
"e9a9bebc9c4732d0"
]
]
}
]
I found it and did it
Sure. You can import this into Node-RED via the ctrl-i / command-i / via the menu and then pasting it into the text area.
That will give you this extra piece of flow:
Put it somewhere on the canvas and then redeploy the flow. That should do the trick.
Thanks, I have done it. What should it do? Where do I have to pay attention to, so that I can inform you about the results?
For now we need to wait a few hours to see if the target SOC is indeed being followed by the battery. I'll keep an eye on your site as well.
If you encounter strange things in the mean time, just update this issue.
be aware that I have an battery expansion planned for today, I will double the capacity from 12 to 24 kWh. That can disturb the process somewhat
That should not be a problem if you:
b_max
to the context)Afterwards you can check in the context data if your flow contains 24 instead of 12 for b_max
(14 in this example screenshot)
Sure. You can import this into Node-RED via the ctrl-i / command-i / via the menu and then pasting it into the text area.
![]()
That will give you this extra piece of flow:
Put it somewhere on the canvas and then redeploy the flow. That should do the trick.
I also did the update and I have added the flow
Looking at a graph of vrm logging, I see that the battery SOC (yellow) is following the target SOC (green) nicely. So I'll close this issue.
Contact Details
siempoot@gmail.com
VRM / Site iD
c0619ab31cc4
Country / region
Netherlands (nl)
B max
40
TB max
5
FB max
7
TG max
16
FG max
16
Battery costs
0.027
Buy price
(p+0.13)*1.21+0.02
Sell price
(p+0.13)*1.21+0.02
feed-in possible
yes
feed-in possible
yes
What happened?
After enabling the new 0.1.1 version, the schedule planned to lower the battery with 15% in one hour (about 6kwh). To reach this I would expect the Multiplus (3x) would have to do some serious work. However it took around 300 to 400 watt from the battery. Also next hour, also with a plan to lower with 15%, exactly the same.
And after 9pm, it still has the plan to lower the SOC, but instead it is charging with around 300 watt from the grid.
I have no errors and the install went fine. What is the problem?
Relevant log output
No response
Screenshots