vikkymal / ebookdroid

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/ebookdroid
0 stars 0 forks source link

Regarding "File browser use multi-column view for large screens" #749

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
   Hi. Regarding new feature in version 2.1.7 "file browser use multi-column view for large screens", there are 2 things:

1) NOT ALL USER like this option & many like "list view = single column view". 
So, you should add an option allow user to select between single column or 
multi-column view as he or she like.

2) Icons size in multi-columns view in version 2.1.7 is inapproperiatly BIG !!

-----------------------
My device is Samsung galaxy 7.7 3G edition (GT-P6800)
OS: JB 4.1.2 official ROM for Singapure

   Best

Original issue reported on code.google.com by dr.y.j.k...@gmail.com on 20 Mar 2014 at 12:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Pls check it in 2.1.8.

Original comment by Alexander.V.Kasatkin@gmail.com on 21 Mar 2014 at 5:13

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
   Hi. It is better on version 2.1.8
   Look for these screen shots: (attached file 1 & 1 bellow). Icons size now very excellent. However I have feeling that size of text of names of icons is somewhat small & need to be enlarged, what you think about this? 
   But I insist on adding option allowing user to select between multicolumn view or list view.

Original comment by dr.y.j.k...@gmail.com on 21 Mar 2014 at 10:02

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I agree, view is better in 2.1.8, but in "list mode" I can see 17.5 items, 
titles have a good visibility, even book modification date is better to read. 
In "icon mode" I can see only 16 items and it's not so easy to find the title 
I'm looking for (IMHO).

I'd prefer a choice/setting for switching between "list mode" and "icon mode".

I'd really love to see a sort option "sort shelf by..." for "Local files", too 
(just like in "Show recent", maybe with an additional sort by author)

Original comment by hac...@hacbase.de on 21 Mar 2014 at 7:18