Closed vikraman closed 3 years ago
I wouldn't say I undestand the whole code, but - why is it not parametrised by n
?
(Such as the relation we've defined in here https://github.com/vikraman/2DTypes/commit/b6b6c35c255622294397bb188c14e579a1a88629 ?)
I changed the definition to be parametrised by n
(e.g. the generators being in Fin n
instead of ℕ) - jus to show what I meant, not as a final statement. Please modify it as you like.
Wouldn't it be better to just expand out the Fin
s like in LL
?
Fixes #8