Open user202729 opened 3 years ago
Looks like that I only need to define let g:pandoc#syntax#roman_lists=1
; however should this be on by default? (pandoc does support it.)
Okay, so when it's defined, it somewhat works but not very well.
It appears that it's some experimental feature, which explains the bugs.
I need to apply the following patches
https://github.com/user202729/vim-pandoc-syntax/commit/30468049c6fc10d45ae14ce37fda35b9945128f9
https://github.com/user202729/vim-pandoc-syntax/commit/ec908dacbaabd90ede58737e1a83e9e703539fd6
The feature is disabled in https://github.com/vim-pandoc/vim-pandoc-syntax/issues/129 , but I don't understand why.
Example:
Pandoc can handle
(i), (ii), (iii), ...
just fine.