Open MasseR opened 7 years ago
Consider changing xslt checker to use xsltproc instead of xmllint.
Working PRs are welcome. I believe I did look at xsltproc
sources a while ago, and I gave up. If I recall correctly the possible error messages are essentially too hostile to parsing.
It also returns xmllint style errors for xml errors:
This is to be expected, they are both using the same library for validation.
Consider changing xslt checker to use xsltproc instead of xmllint.
Example output:
It also returns xmllint style errors for xml errors:
Invoked with
xsltproc file.xsl