Closed gdupras closed 2 years ago
@romainl is it time for a sample_spell.vim
? :)
ron:
blue:
darkblue:
delek:
desert:
elflord:
evening:
industry:
pablo:
peachpuff:
shine:
torte:
zellner:
Thank you @gdupras for your detailed reports.
I'm not super comfortable with the background color, it may clash with other groups like incsearch or quickfixline.
Anyway, let's get on with that sample_spell.vim
;-).
@habamax sample_spell.vim
just landed in fix/spell.
@romainl pls check
@gdupras could you pls also check fix/spell branch?
and indeed, nice catch, @gdupras, thank you!
Those highlight groups are often:
Steps to reproduce the images below:
en.utf-8.add
that only contains::mkspell en.utf-8.add
spell_test.txt
that contains:This shows the Spell groups with the default colorscheme. The groups are, from left to right, SpellCap, SpellLocal, SpellRare, SpellBad.
:source colors/blue.vim
(Or whatever colorscheme you want to check.)default: Looks fine.
blue.vim: Spell groups are not visible.
darkblue.vim: Spell groups are not visible.
delek.vim: SpellLocal and SpellRare look the same.
desert.vim: SpellLocal and SpellRare are very similar.
elflord.vim: SpellLocal is unreadable.
evening.vim: Spell groups are not visible.
industry.vim: SpellLocal and SpellRare are very similar.
koehler.vim: SpellLocal is hard to read.
morning.vim: Looks fine.
murphy.vim: Looks fine.
pablo.vim: SpellLocal is hard to read.
peachpuff.vim: SpellCap and SpellRare are very similar.
ron.vim: SpellLocal is unreadable.
shine.vim: SpellLocal and SpellRare are very similar.
slate.vim: Looks fine.
torte.vim: SpellLocal is hard to read.
zellner.vim: SpellCap and SpellRare look the same.
I've only really tested GUI Vim but I think terminal Vim has similar issues.