Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Not with the current vimwiki parser. You can try to rewrite it, of course. But
that is not trivial.
Original comment by habamax
on 11 Apr 2012 at 4:20
The title seems to indicate that you want XHTML, but then you write as if HTML
validator was complaining about XHTM-isms in the markup.
Whichever way it is: as noted in Comment 1, it is going to be while before the
compliance with standards is improved. But it is going to be for HTML first,
because that is easier and more common.
Anyway, it is an important issue, and certainly not "Done", but is kind of
general, and it will take a while to go over all the obstacles. If you had some
minimal example files (or a list of specific problems the validator pointed
out), this would be much more useful bug report. But I suppose it is not too
difficult to verify that the HTML is non-validating in general.
Original comment by tpospi...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2012 at 7:54
[deleted comment]
thx for all of the answers.I hope I've grasp your ideas.
I tried to make it obay xhtml1.0 first,then I found the way which Vimwiki
produces pages generated tags like "ul" "li" open,then I found that the default
template's DOCTYPE is Html 4.0 So I changed the template.It came better with
rarely "Invalid".However,something Like <hr/> <br /> </p> was found not open
.so just feel a little inconsistency for the generator.
For I really like This script,and only want to make it better measure up to
standard.
just found an issue about html5 support,It's really good for expecting.
Sorry for poor English and awful feedback.
Original comment by lht...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2012 at 9:14
The problem of xhtml single markers is trivial to fix. Thank you for noticing
it, I thought that they were corrected some time ago already.
It is the issues of unmatched or badly nested markers that are difficult to fix
without a complete makeover for the HTML generator. You should definitely use
HTML template, not XHTML.
Regarding HTML5 (mentioned in Issue 142 ?), I have no idea which parts of HTML5
that are not in earlier versions would be of any use for Vimwiki generated
output.
Original comment by tpospi...@gmail.com
on 13 Apr 2012 at 8:34
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
lht...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2012 at 2:06