Closed VitoVan closed 1 year ago
case:
CL-USER> (case 42 (42 (format t "this is 42~%") (format t "this is the answer~%"))) this is 42 this is the answer NIL
string-case:
CL-USER> (str:string-case "42" ("42" (format t "this is 42~%") (format t "this is the answer~%"))) this is 42 NIL
CLHS says the forms of case is an implicit progn.
forms
case
implicit progn
Should cl-str follow this tradition?
This issue was fixed recently in #103 . You can get the fixed version by either
Ah, great! Sorry for not searching thoroughly.
case:
string-case:
CLHS says the
forms
ofcase
is animplicit progn
.Should cl-str follow this tradition?