Closed ignaciogc closed 5 years ago
Thank you @tiny-titan, I like the changes. Two points tho:
README.md
copy of this one)I will take a look at the JS version an update it as well.
The main reasons I decided to use "hashed ids" were:
Let me know if you want me to change those before merging.
Yep, totally understand. There's a bit of history with using the word "hash" (we even thought about renaming the library at some point). If we could use the terms "id" or "string id" or "output id", I think it'd be better. Personally I prefer just "ids" for the simplicity, but I'm open to other suggestions. The rest of the changes look really good!
I've updated the text to avoid using hashed ids, and instead using output ids.
Thank you @ignaciogc :+1:
No problem. I'll look at the Javascript version next and update with similar changes.
Nothing major, but there were a few places where the documentation could be clarified / re-worded.