Closed xorhex closed 5 years ago
Merging #757 into master will decrease coverage by
0.05%
. The diff coverage is22.5%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #757 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 44.88% 44.82% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 131 131
Lines 14476 14513 +37
==========================================
+ Hits 6497 6505 +8
- Misses 7979 8008 +29
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
viper/modules/strings.py | 21.91% <17.14%> (-1.08%) |
:arrow_down: |
viper/common/objects.py | 75% <60%> (-0.43%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 967c7d8...2bf8cc3. Read the comment docs.
These look good to me. Thanks!
These are two commands I've been using for awhile in my local viper instance and wanted to share.
Added two features to the strings module.
-x
which accepts a single byte xor key that the data is xor'ed with before any filters are applied (-H
,-N
, etc.). The idea here is to take the key found from thexor
command and apply it to strings.-r
added as a second string extraction method using r2. Sometimes r2 finds strings not found by the default string extraction method and sometimes the default finds strings r2 does not find. The-x
flag does not work with the-r
flag.The modification to objects.py is to support xor operation in strings. Let me know if I should do this differently.