stale[bot]
commented
4 years ago This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Recent discussions in the OpenLibra.io community brought about this discussion.
Instant Runoff RVC is deeply flawed.
See https://twitter.com/jaekwon/status/1194890572240044032
All RVC voting have biases (preferences), but a non-concordent system where non-majority-acceptable proposals are passed IMO are fundamentally unacceptable.
Secrecy + UnfairProposals combo is inherently dangerous
See https://github.com/open-libra/governance/issues/4#issue-523855012
Privacy vs Transparency
There is a need to better understand when privacy of voting is needed, vs transparency, while addressing the issues above.
OpenLibra experiment
OpenLibra.io is conducting a vote and I have organized an open poll that is a variant of the Approval Voting process. Namely, a strict majority of approvals is necessary for a proposal to be deemed acceptable.
See https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1e-YlugA8Nwa0oeU-IgNBzlo2LfqOADN65uh9NR_45Ag/edit#gid=0 for all the gory details, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approval_voting for more commentary.