Open Germano0 opened 1 week ago
Thanks for the report. Can you test with virt-manager upstream and capture debug output and attach it here:
git clone https://github.com/virt-manager/virt-manager
cd virt-manager
./virt-manager --debug
With virt-manager upstream the performances are better [*] but virt-viewer is still more smooth.
I tried to compare them by using glxgears
, and on virt-manager upstream I get 10 FPS, and on virt-viewer I get 20 FPS
[*]: I was also able to run a VM with OpenGL enabled on Spice Display, which I was not able to achieve in Fedora virt-manager
Hmm. I have no idea how rendering speed works TBH, so maybe virt-manager just being slower than virt-viewer accounts for the difference (python vs c etc.). Do you have any ideas how to investigate further? This may basically be unactionable on my side...
virtual machines have very slow graphics on both
virtio
andqxl
, so slow that often I can see how the desktop effects on VMs are rendered (I.E. the direction of fading effect). I cannot reproduce the problem withsudo virt-viewer --attach foo_vm
cause the graphic in this case is way faster and reactive.HOST MACHINE:
I tested both Linux and Windows virtual machines.