virtio-win package from repo gives signature error in Fedora 36 Software Center

[ghost]

Fedora Workstation 36 install with virtio repo added, getting this error today while trying to download:

/var/cache/PackageKit/36/metadata/virtio-win-latest-36-x86_64/packages/virtio-win-0.1.217-2.noarch.rpm could not be verified. /var/cache/PackageKit/36/metadata/virtio-win-latest-36-x86_64/packages/virtio-win-0.1.217-2.noarch.rpm: digest: SIGNATURE: NOT OK

Is this related to the policy of not signing the pvpanic, smbus, etc, drivers for community release, or is this a bug? Does this channel cover this issue or is there someone else that should address this?

Using this repo info (only modified from original to enable latest instead of stable):

# virtio-win yum repo
# Details: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Windows_Virtio_Drivers

[virtio-win-stable]
name=virtio-win builds roughly matching what was shipped in latest RHEL
baseurl=https://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virtio-win/repo/stable
enabled=0
skip_if_unavailable=1
gpgcheck=0

[virtio-win-latest]
name=Latest virtio-win builds
baseurl=https://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virtio-win/repo/latest
enabled=1
skip_if_unavailable=1
gpgcheck=0

[virtio-win-source]
name=virtio-win source RPMs
baseurl=https://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virtio-win/repo/srpms
enabled=0
skip_if_unavailable=1
gpgcheck=0

[vrozenfe]

It shouldn't be related to pvpanic and stub-drivers. Give us some time to check with fedora guys why it happens even with "gpgcheck=0" Vadim.

[ghost]

Thanks! FYI: I didn't try 'dnf update'. I kinda want to see this issue get resolved, in case dnf didn't throw the error.