Open vschettino opened 7 years ago
Hi there! Thanks a lot for the suggestions Indeed it would be very helpful. The study selection need some rework and improvements. Specially when dealing with large datasets. I added your suggestion to my backlog.
Nice!
Any thoughts about implementing a label/tag functionality to classify studies, or something similar? I think that would help a lot at the classification step.
@vschettino Are not "Unclassified", "Accepted", "Rejected", and "Duplicate" enough labelling?
@A-Infor to be honest I don't recall exactly what was the exact use case :) (it's been 6 years)
I'm guessing the labels would help identifying which papers answer a given research question. Also they could help different forms or organization, like we do with GitHub labels. A few examples would be "needs another reading" or "missing non critical info" and any other stuff. The uses for those arise when we work with larger datasets.
Hi,
Any thoughts about implementing a label/tag functionality to classify studies, or something similar? I think that would help a lot at the classification step.
Another good thing would be a more filter/sort fields while selecting the studies. For instance with the labels/tags I just suggested, or with the inclusion/exclusion criteria that Parsifal already have.
Thanks and congrats for the project! It's amazing :)