Closed HeikoKlare closed 3 years ago
Thank you for all the feedback, @jGleitz! I will incorporate all the suggestions before merging the PR.
I was quite shocked when taking a look at the code (especially the one in the tools.vitruv.framework.change.echange.tests
project), because the overall structure is really bad. Although the PR is mainly about migrating to JUnit5, I have also started to fix some of the major issues, but it seems to be too much effort now to fix all of them. So I will at least consider those that are easy to resolve, including the ones you have pointed at.
tools.vitruv.framework.change.tests
to JUnit 5tools.vitruv.framework.change.echange.tests
to JUnit 5tools.vitruv.framework.change.tests
tools.vitruv.framework.change.tests
to improve comprehension and unify the behavior of the change recording