Open hauschke opened 5 months ago
What is the motivation for your change request? Improved metadata of the ontology itself is needed to make it FAIR. It would allow for wider distribution, easier reuse and improved visibility.
Describe the solution you'd like An iterative process based on the suggestion by @SArndt-TIB in https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/VIVO/2024-02-07+Ontology+Interest+Group+Call and https://pad.gwdg.de/wl227domTnKLAmGFPuqfmQ?view#. We can start with metadata that is undisputed and easy to declare. Improvements can follow in later iterations. Based on the discussion in https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/VIVO/2024-06-05+Ontology+Interest+Group+Call it should be done en bloc, not one issue per statement.
Describe alternatives you've considered One issue per metadata property.
Additional context
The Ontology IG decided to split this issue up into multiple smaller issues and PRs to make progress easier: https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/VIVO/2024-11-20+Ontology+Interest+Group+Call
What is the motivation for your change request? Improved metadata of the ontology itself is needed to make it FAIR. It would allow for wider distribution, easier reuse and improved visibility.
Describe the solution you'd like An iterative process based on the suggestion by @SArndt-TIB in https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/VIVO/2024-02-07+Ontology+Interest+Group+Call and https://pad.gwdg.de/wl227domTnKLAmGFPuqfmQ?view#. We can start with metadata that is undisputed and easy to declare. Improvements can follow in later iterations. Based on the discussion in https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/VIVO/2024-06-05+Ontology+Interest+Group+Call it should be done en bloc, not one issue per statement.
Describe alternatives you've considered One issue per metadata property.
Additional context