search

vivo-project / VIVO

VIVO is an extensible semantic web application for research discovery and showcasing scholarly work
http://vivoweb.org
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
205 stars 128 forks source link

VIVO-1663: Add more person identifiers to VIVO #3253

Open chenejac opened 5 years ago

chenejac commented 5 years ago

Don Elsborg (Migrated from VIVO-1663) said:

There is a desire by various institutions, like CU Boulder, to add more identifiers into VIVO.

Some of this was done in OpenVIVO - see the links under Weblinks at: [http://openvivo.org/display/orcid0000-0002-1304-8447]

CU Boulder is already adding the following in their 1.9.3 instance via data properties with range of anyURI:

Ralph from UAB mentioned:

chenejac commented 5 years ago

Don Elsborg said:

CU Boulder impletemented the linkedIn and Twitter identifiers as vcard_urls to show under weblinks and the others as data properties to show under the Identifiers group.

Example can be seen at: [https://github.com/cu-boulder/vivo-cuboulder/pull/5/files] in the CU repo.

chenejac commented 5 years ago

Benjamin Gross said:

FYI, ResearcherID is already in the VIVO ontology: https://github.com/vivo-project/VIVO/blob/7a963c2ef93f75942cf60b88f75c4c29bbc3194d/home/src/main/resources/rdf/tbox/filegraph/vivo.owl#L4763, the description could use a refresh, however.

chenejac commented 5 years ago

Mike Conlon said:

As is ScopusID.  

Refreshing descriptions is good work, too.

chenejac commented 5 years ago

Mike Conlon said:

Here's the UF list of local datatype properties

 

 

 

chenejac commented 5 years ago

Benjamin Gross said:

I assume Thomson Reuters UT and Web of Science ID are the same? The WoS platform also refers to this number as an 'Accession Number,' the reasoning being that the field needs to encompass both unique IDs assigned by WoS and those coming from third party databases accessible through WoS.

I have also used ISNI and GRiD in previous projects. harvested from (provenance info) is a good idea, though I have not tracked this in the past.

chenejac commented 5 years ago

Mike Conlon said:

Thomson Reuters UT and Web of Science ID may be the same – they are the results of two implementations about 7 years apart.  I'm not that close to UF implementation any more, so not sure.

The harvested from attribute just contains the name of the process, including version, used.  Helps track down data that may need to be improved, as do the dates of the harvest.

GRiD would be very good to have.

chenejac commented 5 years ago

Christian Hauschke said:

GND ID is the single most important ID for the German community. When we are talking about humanities etc. the VIAF ID could be important, too. @chemGoggles, are you using VIAF?

Another thing that will be available hopefully soon is a DOI based ID for conferences. But I think we have to wait a bit for this.

PS: I just asked for comments in the German VIVO mailing list. I can think of a handful of IDs that could be relevant. Wikidata of course - thanks @tawahle for the reminder - but some funder's IDs, too.

chenejac commented 5 years ago

Tatiana Walther said:

What about Wikidata ID? 

ZDB ID for periodicals could be very helpfull in Germany.

chenejac commented 5 years ago

Don Elsborg said:

Another place to look for identifiers is the results of this wikidata query: https://query.wikidata.org/sparql?query=SELECT%20%3FWikidata_property_for_authority_control_for_people%20%3FWikidata_property_for_authority_control_for_peopleLabel%20WHERE%20%7B%0A%20%20SERVICE%20wikibase%3Alabel%20%7B%20bd%3AserviceParam%20wikibase%3Alanguage%20%22%5BAUTO_LANGUAGE%5D%2Cen%22.%20%7D%0A%20%20%3FWikidata_property_for_authority_control_for_people%20wdt%3AP31%20wd%3AQ19595382.%0A%7D%0A&format=json

chenejac commented 2 years ago

This issue is related to #2927