Open nitanagdeote opened 3 years ago
My first thought is, private forks are included in the count, but not in the listing.
Also there is a chance that the data could be wrong (the way we backfilled those values was a bit ... sketchy - could do it again).
Idea: Include something in the forks page that says how many private forks there are, but not include any info on who forked them.
The issue is that the forks count includes private forks.
Should it?
Maybe it should only show the number of public forks?
I wonder what GitHub does...
If it shows the total that includes private forks, then the existence of those forks is not actually ... private. In a way this is leaking out private information (the fact that the viz was forked at all).
On map viz the fork count seems wrong for this user( image attached)![wrong_no_of_forks_on_map_viz](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/13540669/107284496-eb5fe380-6a2b-11eb-999d-06ea6611ed86.png)