That representation is not quite accurate since the syntax means that the A column extends two rows. A more semantic presentation of a rowspan would be something like this where the second row is aligned under the B column.
|/2. A | B |
| |
In other cases where the rowspan is between two columns it is less clear what is the right thing to do. Currently a three-column table with a rowspan on the second column is formatted like this
| A |/2. B | C |
| | |
There is no great way to represent that in Textile, but this could work
| A |/2. B | C |
| | |
Here we align the columns on their left edges, so A is as wide as it needs to be to allow C to be aligned. Not sure if some of the colspan logic can come into play here for the sake of rendering but it looks possible.
This is not a severe issue since either way Textile still generates the correct table. Just a question of whether it is possible to keep the other columns aligned. Great work so far, this plugin is extremely helpful!
Currently, a rowspan entered like this
is formatted like this
That representation is not quite accurate since the syntax means that the A column extends two rows. A more semantic presentation of a rowspan would be something like this where the second row is aligned under the B column.
In other cases where the rowspan is between two columns it is less clear what is the right thing to do. Currently a three-column table with a rowspan on the second column is formatted like this
There is no great way to represent that in Textile, but this could work
Here we align the columns on their left edges, so A is as wide as it needs to be to allow C to be aligned. Not sure if some of the colspan logic can come into play here for the sake of rendering but it looks possible.
This is not a severe issue since either way Textile still generates the correct table. Just a question of whether it is possible to keep the other columns aligned. Great work so far, this plugin is extremely helpful!