Closed vkoves closed 2 months ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 93bae5b0ce2cc562f15964ebf6b47c95f877c65f |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/radiant-cucurucho-d09bae/deploys/660cb1106e8d570008ebe8bf |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-81--radiant-cucurucho-d09bae.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
The one issue here is that older bad buildings lose a lot of their context, like Hermnan Hall:
Before | After |
---|---|
I think to handle that we'd need rankings for each year (e.g. Herman Hall is X worst of 2021 buildings) but that seems like it would take a lot of post-processing.
Note to self: Email Climate Reality folks when this goes live
We've updated the concern levels (how we color stat tiles) so that we show tiles as high concern if the related stat is > 1 standard deviation above the mean. This ensures that bad buildings that didn't report in the latest year still don't look great, even if they don't have a "#X in Chicago" note.
Here's a comparison with Crown Hall:
Before | After |
---|---|
Description
Updates the data to the year 2022 (the latest data). A lot of the previously dirtiest buildings (typically from IIT) did not report in 2022, so to prevent these from going off the radar (when they haven't made improvements) and to show any other old buildings that are very polluting, all dirty building pages now do not filter by the latest year, and instead we show an icon ( š°ļø ) for buildings whose data is old.
Some other updates:
Fixes #63
Testing Instructions
Please describe the tests/QA that you did to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration
Checklist: