Open georgelemon opened 3 years ago
Ok, I just discovered that V has a documentation parser based on docstrings and also there is a Github action for V projects
it's nice, it's a bit too generic, but if it allows us to get a website quickly, why not
I think it's great for a documentation website to be generic. It's easier for users to grasp, and therefore makes them want to stay.
I just disagree about the technical choices:
@Gladear, I agree but take in consideration that since Bootstrap sources are available in SCSS we can grab from there only the utilities, form and grid system. Also, the Autocomplete.js library has 650 lines unminified (no external deps), so minified is around 9kb.
A baseline assumption: Whatever is used, it should be as simple and self-contained as possibly, and should NOT require any complex build system (which includes node.js/npms, etc.). It should also be as small as possible, so that load times are snappy. We don't want 100k+ of JS+CSS for a simple landing page.
I think the website needs a CSS framework instead of plain. Personally, I always use Bootstrap (only CSS, no JS).
I can help with the following: