@jakzal I think that the original intention was that a failure handled by an otherwise() would terminate the pipeline. However, I don't disagree that it should be possible to continue the pipeline if otherwise() actually recovers the failure.
Given that preexisting pipelines terminate on failure should (or would hopefully) not cause problems because most/all purposely short circuit by producing a final outcome. For example, 404 or 500 on some HTTP response.
I agree we shouldn't continue the pipeline once a failure occurs, but the following otherwise* functions and consumers should still be executed.
Following @VaughnVernon's comment: https://github.com/vlingo/xoom-common/pull/44#issuecomment-898066969
I agree we shouldn't continue the pipeline once a failure occurs, but the following otherwise* functions and consumers should still be executed.