provide the list of dams/media-licenses terms

[marc-portier]

some viable starting points:

• https://spdx.org/licenses/ --> but get rid of the software ones
• https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/License_Properties - both for URI as for suggestions to type and annotate them further

also consider

• to narrow the full list to what we need inside vliz --> ask around in the dams team?
• to reach out to others with experience in this space (imec? inuits?)

[Fonsvh]

We had a discussion two years ago with NIOZ about this in relation to Plan-S and decided to use CC-BY in combination with some other concepts. Notably the last two are important. The last one can be used for 'orphan works' or unlicensed work. It's public 'according to our current knowledge', or 'as long as otherwise proved'; while the second last one is used when it's explicitly completely open for everyone without the obligation to refer to someone.

[bart-v]

For images, we certainly need "copyright" or "copyrighted work" We could use "allrightsreserved" from https://rdflicense.linkeddata.es/ or similar

[marc-portier]

For images, we certainly need "copyright" or "copyrighted work" We could use "allrightsreserved" from https://rdflicense.linkeddata.es/ or similar

+1 for some 'all-rights-reserved' as it makes the distinction clear between the two distinct aspects - (1) having a copyright / owner / beneficiary and (2) any published acceptable mode 'license' of use

[laurianvm]

going through https://rdflicense.linkeddata.es/; would any of the following licenses be of interest for DAMS?

• Academic Free License 3.0
• European Commission Copyright
• European Union Public License
• Open Data Commons Attribution License