Open hxer7963 opened 6 months ago
Hi @hxer7963, if my math is correct I do not think you can fit an unquantized 480GB model on 8x80GB GPUs. 8 80 = 640GB available memory and the model weights at BF16 would take up 2 480 = 960GB, so that is very much over the memory available. Maybe if you had an 8bit or 4bit quantization with GPTQ, you could fit the model.
Also, I would recommend trying to upgrade vLLM as you are on 0.4.0 per vLLM Version: 0.4.0
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity within 90 days. It will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs within 30 days. Leave a comment if you feel this issue should remain open. Thank you!
Your current environment
PyTorch version: 2.1.2+cu121 Is debug build: False CUDA used to build PyTorch: 12.1 ROCM used to build PyTorch: N/A
OS: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS (x86_64) GCC version: (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0 Clang version: 14.0.0-1ubuntu1.1 CMake version: version 3.26.2 Libc version: glibc-2.35
Python version: 3.9.18 (main, Sep 11 2023, 13:41:44) [GCC 11.2.0] (64-bit runtime) Python platform: Linux-5.4.119-19-0009.11-x86_64-with-glibc2.35 Is CUDA available: True CUDA runtime version: 12.3.107 CUDA_MODULE_LOADING set to: LAZY GPU models and configuration: GPU 0: NVIDIA A800-SXM4-80GB GPU 1: NVIDIA A800-SXM4-80GB GPU 2: NVIDIA A800-SXM4-80GB GPU 3: NVIDIA A800-SXM4-80GB GPU 4: NVIDIA A800-SXM4-80GB GPU 5: NVIDIA A800-SXM4-80GB GPU 6: NVIDIA A800-SXM4-80GB GPU 7: NVIDIA A800-SXM4-80GB
Nvidia driver version: 470.182.03 cuDNN version: Probably one of the following: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn.so.8.9.7 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn.so.9.0.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_adv.so.9.0.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_adv_infer.so.8.9.7 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_adv_train.so.8.9.7 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_cnn.so.9.0.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_cnn_infer.so.8.9.7 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_cnn_train.so.8.9.7 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_engines_precompiled.so.9.0.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_engines_runtime_compiled.so.9.0.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_graph.so.9.0.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_heuristic.so.9.0.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_ops.so.9.0.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_ops_infer.so.8.9.7 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcudnn_ops_train.so.8.9.7 HIP runtime version: N/A MIOpen runtime version: N/A Is XNNPACK available: True
CPU: Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Address sizes: 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 232 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-231 Vendor ID: AuthenticAMD Model name: AMD EPYC 7K83 64-Core Processor CPU family: 25 Model: 1 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 58 Socket(s): 2 Stepping: 1 BogoMIPS: 4890.80 Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl nonstop_tsc cpuid extd_apicid amd_dcm tsc_known_freq pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm cmp_legacy cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw topoext perfctr_core invpcid_single ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp vmmcall fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rdseed adx smap clflushopt clwb sha_ni xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves clzero xsaveerptr wbnoinvd arat umip pku ospke vaes vpclmulqdq rdpid fsrm Hypervisor vendor: KVM Virtualization type: full L1d cache: 3.6 MiB (116 instances) L1i cache: 3.6 MiB (116 instances) L2 cache: 58 MiB (116 instances) L3 cache: 512 MiB (16 instances) NUMA node(s): 2 NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-115 NUMA node1 CPU(s): 116-231 Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected Vulnerability L1tf: Not affected Vulnerability Mds: Not affected Vulnerability Meltdown: Not affected Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Mitigation; Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl and seccomp Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization Vulnerability Spectre v2: Mitigation; Full AMD retpoline, IBPB conditional, IBRS_FW, STIBP conditional, RSB filling Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected
Versions of relevant libraries: [pip3] mypy==0.991 [pip3] mypy-extensions==1.0.0 [pip3] numpy==1.26.4 [pip3] nvidia-nccl-cu12==2.18.1 [pip3] torch==2.1.2 [pip3] triton==2.1.0 [conda] numpy 1.26.4 pypi_0 pypi [conda] nvidia-nccl-cu12 2.18.1 pypi_0 pypi [conda] torch 2.1.2 pypi_0 pypi [conda] triton 2.1.0 pypi_0 pypiROCM Version: Could not collect Neuron SDK Version: N/A vLLM Version: 0.4.0 vLLM Build Flags: CUDA Archs: Not Set; ROCm: Disabled; Neuron: Disabled GPU Topology: GPU0 GPU1 GPU2 GPU3 GPU4 GPU5 GPU6 GPU7 CPU Affinity NUMA Affinity GPU0 X NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 0-115 0 GPU1 NV8 X NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 0-115 0 GPU2 NV8 NV8 X NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 0-115 0 GPU3 NV8 NV8 NV8 X NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 0-115 0 GPU4 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 X NV8 NV8 NV8 116-231 1 GPU5 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 X NV8 NV8 116-231 1 GPU6 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 X NV8 116-231 1 GPU7 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 NV8 X 116-231 1
Legend:
X = Self SYS = Connection traversing PCIe as well as the SMP interconnect between NUMA nodes (e.g., QPI/UPI) NODE = Connection traversing PCIe as well as the interconnect between PCIe Host Bridges within a NUMA node PHB = Connection traversing PCIe as well as a PCIe Host Bridge (typically the CPU) PXB = Connection traversing multiple PCIe bridges (without traversing the PCIe Host Bridge) PIX = Connection traversing at most a single PCIe bridge NV# = Connection traversing a bonded set of # NVLinks
🐛 Describe the bug
I run the following command on a server with 8 * A800 (80GB) GPUs and 1.8TB of memory:
I noticed that vLLM initially loads the model into the 8 A800 GPUs, with each GPU consuming approximately 64GB of memory on average, without pre-allocating memory. Subsequently, I observed that the DRAM memory keeps increasing until an Out-of-Memory (OOM) error occurs. Please refer to the screenshot below for details.
Then, I learned that I can reduce the risk of RAM OOM by setting the
--max-parallel-loading-workers
parameter. However, when I set--max-parallel-loading-workers 1
, I encountered the following error:2588
I noticed that PR #1395 has fixed the RAM OOM issue, but why am I still encountering OOM errors when loading a 480GB MoE model with 8tp and 1.8TB of memory?