Open rzach opened 1 week ago
Source code:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{bookml/bookml}
\bmlImageEnvironment{tikzpicture}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows,positioning,shapes}
\tikzset{phantom_shape/.style={thick, fill=none, minimum width=30pt, minimum height=30pt}, % TB: renders the shape invisible
grey_shape/.style={thick, fill=black!20, draw, minimum width=30pt, minimum height=30pt}, % TB: renders a light grey shape with a black outline
white_shape/.style={thick, fill=none, draw, minimum width=30pt, minimum height=30pt} % TB: renders a white shape with a black outline
}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node (atom1) at (0,2) {$1$};
\node (atom2) at (2,2) {$2$};
\node (atom3) at (2,0) {$3$};
\node (atom4) at (0,0) {$4$};
\draw[->, thick] (atom1)--(atom2);
\draw[->, thick] (atom2)--(atom3);
\draw[->, thick] (atom3)--(atom4);
\draw[->, thick] (atom4)--(atom1);
\draw[->, thick] (atom1) -- (atom3);
\end{tikzpicture}
\bmlDescription{This is a test}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node[circle, grey_shape] (cat1) {A};
\node[right=10pt of cat1, diamond, phantom_shape] (cat2) { } ;
\node[right=10pt of cat2, circle, white_shape] (cat3) {C} ;
\node[right=10pt of cat3, white_shape] (cat4) {D};
\end{tikzpicture}
\bmlDescription{There are three shapes: the first shape is a grey circle labelled A, some empty space, the second shape is a white circle labelled C, and the fourth a white square labelled D.}
\end{document}
I cannot reproduce it here with the 'official' Docker image (TeX Live 2021 final + LaTeXML 0.8.8 + BookML 0.10.1). I get Not perfect, but not as bad as your example.
Could you please check running plain latexml/latexmlpost and without importing the bookml package? Does that improve things?
Ok, latexml
actually produces the same (broken) output. No idea what changed; it's possible that it's a problem in TikZ itself (I updated to TeXLive 2024).
I'll just use bmlimage
. Is there a way to make it use the same fonts in images as in the surrounding text? (I'm guessing it's because bookml.sty.ltxml
calls dvisvgm
with the --no-fonts
option, i.e., text is converted to paths.)
it's possible that it's a problem in TikZ itself (I updated to TeXLive 2024).
Could you please report it to LaTeXML? It sounds indeed like TikZ has changed something recently. They don't test TeX Live 2024 regularly, nor TikZ, so I am sure they would like to know.
Is there a way to make it use the same fonts in images as in the surrounding text?
No, or at least not in a reliable way. I'll keep the issue open while I test a few ideas (and also while the upstream bug is still there), but I am not optimistic about it. External SVGs do not interact nicely with the CSS of the outer document.
Actually I lied: I ran it through just latexmlc
but I forgot that I was loading bookml.sty.
With bookml.sty
the output is:
while with just latexml.sty
it is:
So bookml.sty.ltxml
seems to be doing something to cause this.
Firefox bug! It looks like Firefox is positioning some SVG elements, including <foreignObject>
, before applying the CSS zoom property. Then you try to rescale via zoom, as BookML does, and everything ends up in the wrong place. And I see all sorts of rendering glitches when modifying the code in the inspector. Nasty. I'll figure out a way to report this upstream.
I have disabled SVG scaling in Firefox. Unfortunately, images will look very odd when changing font size, but still much closer to the intended look. I believe Firefox will fix it soon, though (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1927186).
I updated bookml to 10.1 and I'm getting weird behavior with images in my book. I'm guessing it's related to the image scaling changes in 0.8.0. Images are generated with
\tikzpicture
. With and withoutbmlimage
:I had avoided
bmlimage
because I don't want the fonts inside images to be Computer Modern but rather the same as the surrounding font (note the A, C, and D. The new scaling breaks this. I could live withbmlimage
but is there a way to keep the fonts straight?With
bmlimage
I also get these Inkscape warnings: