vmavromatis / absolutely-proprietary

Proprietary package detector for arch-based distros. Compares your installed packages against Parabola's package blacklist and then prints your Stallman Freedom Index (free/total).
GNU General Public License v3.0
275 stars 10 forks source link

A little complication when parabola user try it #39

Open RedStarfish opened 4 years ago

RedStarfish commented 4 years ago

Hello, I use Parabola GNU/Linux. I thought I give it a try just to get great score (like 100% free). So when I ran the program I got this list of non free packages:

` Name Status Libre Alternatives Description
clamav semifree clamav has nonfree unrar support for RAR into libclamunrar
hexchat uses-nonfree hexchat Hard-codes the firefox command in some menus
kio uses-nonfree kio
parabola
1066
has non-privacy search engines by default
licenses uses-nonfree licenses Remove non-free CC -NC and -ND licenses (also add WTFPL)
midori uses-nonfree midori has non-privacy search engines
okular semifree okular
parabola
1067
has copy-protection anti-feature turn on by default
openexr semifree openexr
parabola
374
includes embedded nonfree fonts in the documentation
ruby semifree ruby
parabola
674
json module has nonfree CVTUTF code; replace with pure Ruby implementation
sdl semifree sdl contains a source file that doesn't mention modification
signon-ui uses-nonfree signon-ui
parabola
2603
depends on qt5-webengine
texlive-core semifree texlive-core some nonfree packages
texlive-fontsextra semifree texlive-fontsextra some nonfree packages
texlive-latexextra semifree texlive-latexextra some nonfree packages
unzip semifree unzip contains a source file that doesn't mention modification
xarchiver uses-nonfree xarchiver recommends nonfree unrar
xmms2 uses-nonfree xmms2
parabola
841
depends and recommends nonfree mac installation
xscreensaver semifree xscreensaver
parabola
131
dmsc.asm file don't have source code supplied `

It's right that these packages are non free/semi-free but parabola has a [libre] repo which fixes these issues and then distribute these packages. So they are not really proprietary anymore.

Another problem/bug I noticed when I installed the program from AUR and then ran it. The list of packages(the pretty tabular box) were empty every time though it'd show the number of "non-free" packages.

arthurbacci commented 3 years ago

Does #40 fixes it?