Closed alexvasseur closed 8 years ago
thanks for the suggestion. just added: https://github.com/pivotalservices/cfops/commit/6761f0381d9d71e249b1bf81e4eb43ff3b5b7680
I would really suggest to explicitly write "BOSH CLI is not needed as cfops interacts with BOSH director thru the REST endpoints directly". That makes it more explicit imho
I suggest to improve the doc / readme. cfops does not relies on calling BOSH CLI (and Ruby that BOSH CLI needs) as it is calling BOSH director REST API directly. This makes it nice to install in a techops VM that relies on some datastore that has also infrastructure driven snapshoting for example - as then backup created by cfops in such a techops VM gets automatically snapshotted.
This is different from the default Pivotal Cloud Foundry that describes use of BOSH CLI for some of the backup/restore tasks. Of course BOSH CLI might be useful to manage Pivotal Cloud Foundry but one has BOSH CLI in Pivotal OpsManager already.