Closed jerrinsg closed 5 years ago
Throughput (MB/s) comparison - bitmap vs channel
Key pattern - R:R
Write ratio | Bitmap | Channel |
---|---|---|
20 | 408.381 | 138.42 |
40 | 381.405 | 245.848 |
60 | 368.596 | 344.819 |
80 | 365.735 | 414.608 |
100 | 361.924 | 419.496 |
Key pattern - S:S
Write ratio | Bitmap | Channel |
---|---|---|
20 | 416.044 | 156.254 |
40 | 369.088 | 277.735 |
60 | 558.006 | 573.923 |
80 | 413.001 | 428.629 |
100 | 302.650 | 301.448 |
Configuration Clients per thread = 50 Threads = 4 Requests/client = 100000 Data-size=1000 Pipeline=100
Merged in #20
Using a channel to manage transaction handles was seen to be a source of bottleneck while running memtier-benchmark. This commit introduces a bitmap array that is atomically set and unset to manage transaction handles.