Add and test toggle for sorting column items by the number of votes

[nickkhg]

Thanks for contributing to postfacto. To speed up the process of reviewing your pull request please provide us with:

• A short explanation of the proposed change: This PR adds a toggle button on the retro page which allows the client to sort the list of items in each column by the number of votes it has received.

• An explanation of the use cases your change solves This is useful for the discussions that follow the addition of items, so that the conversations can be held in order of importance, as voted by the team. Oftentimes the columns can get quite long, so having this simple feature could help a lot.

• Links to any other associated PRs (-)

• [x] I have reviewed the contributing guide

• [x] I have made this pull request to the master branch

• [x] I have run all the tests using ./test.sh.

• [N/A] I have added the copyright headers to each new file added

• [x] I have given myself credit in the humans.txt file (assuming I want to)

[textbook]

Notes on the functionality:

• Adds a new ❤️ icon beside the input of each column happy/meh/sad
• When clicked, the icon toggles state between active and inactive (initially all are inactive)
• When active, the column gets sorted by likes (greatest first); when inactive, the column gets sorted by age (newest first)
• If the likes change, the column gets reordered
• Ties on number of likes are broken by age
• This is a local setting, so each viewer chooses whether to see each column in original or like order
• The selection doesn't persist (e.g. if you go into settings then back to the board, all columns get reset)

Visual (desktop size, on the happy column):

Inactive	Hover	Active

Previous discussion on ordering/sorting items:

• 28

• 354

[nickkhg]

@textbook Thank you for the detailed description of the feature and the links to the issues, no idea how I missed them! I've read through the replies on there and saw it's against the product philosophy, but I would argue this is very much dependent on the team. Sorting by the number of votes doesn't necessarily mean that the entries with no votes won't be discussed, but it's rather more of a matter of prioritisation.

Is this something that would still be considered?

[Bierbarbar]

Hey @textbook I totally get your point. But I think some teams might work different or postfacto is used in a big cross team audience, so that is might be needed to order by likes due to time constraints. I would like to suggest the following why not adding a flag to the configuration file wether the the sort option is available/useable or not. So each team can decide if they want to use it or not.