Closed akodali18 closed 4 years ago
I'm wondering if these should be based on the
flushInterval
.
This is just the default interval for now to get this fix out sooner. We will make this reporting interval configurable in the next change and then the adapter and wavefront reporting intervals will be based off of that. Then users would be able to fine tune by setting both reporting interval as well as flush interval based on their needs.
In general, i meant to say updating those metrics in internal registry frequently might not be needed , since we don't write to buffer until reporting interval is elapsed.
Description {{ Succinctly describe your change }}
Additional context {{ Add any other context about the change here, for example, Fixes #issue-number }}