Closed pradeep17j closed 5 months ago
@pradeep17j the cluster_image_id
input is optional.
Can you share your configuration? If I am not mistaken not providing a value for the image ID should result in a VUM-managed cluster on the management domain
@stoyanzhelyazkov ,
To have control of VUM/vLCM based mgmt domain in bringup, the changes are required in resource_vcf_instance. It will have to accept a bool parameter named clusterImageEnabled. I assume , For this the vcf-sdk-go needs to be built with 5.1 swagger.json or the auto generated code in vcf-sdk-go will have to be manually edited to accept the new param in models/sddc_cluster_spec.go .
I guess the cluster_image_id you are mentioning will be applicable for day2 operations when adding a new cluster to WLD
A sample portion of bringup.json with 5.1 looks like below
"clusterSpec": {
"clusterName": "SDDC-Cluster1",
"clusterEvcMode": "",
"clusterImageEnabled": false,
"resourcePoolSpecs": [
{
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.
Code of Conduct
Description
The bringup workflow does not allow disabling vLCM based MGMT domain. Since VCF 5.0 , vLCM is default . If we need to do a VUM based bringup, we need the control to disable vLCM
The schema does not accept clusterImage=False configuration
Use Case(s)
To bringup VUM based MGMT domains
Potential Configuration
VUM based MGMT domain
References
No response