Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This issue was updated by revision r2881.
- Added some more mappings
Original comment by richard.eckart
on 4 Oct 2014 at 10:23
I'll resolve this for the time being. If anybody wants to review the
(incomplete) mappings before 1.7.0 - please do so. Otherwise, we can have a new
issue for the next version if desired.
Original comment by richard.eckart
on 12 Nov 2014 at 8:42
is there any documentation about the DKPro Core types in Constituency?
(e.g. where does SBAR, SINV etc come from)
I did not find any, also not in the DKPro Core book
otherwise I would volunteer to review the mapping - had a brief look and it
seems to be a mapping where a lot of useful information is lost
Original comment by eckle.kohler
on 12 Nov 2014 at 9:55
Afaik the DKPro Core constituent types correspond to the Penn Treebank
constituent types as produced by the Stanford parser.
See: http://bulba.sdsu.edu/jeanette/thesis/PennTags.html
See:
https://dkpro-core-asl.googlecode.com/svn/de.tudarmstadt.ukp.dkpro.core-asl/trun
k/de.tudarmstadt.ukp.dkpro.core.api.syntax-asl/src/main/resources/de/tudarmstadt
/ukp/dkpro/core/api/syntax/tagset/en-ptb-constituency.map
Issue 516 (formerly issue 99) contains some discussion about adopting more
"universal" tags, but this hasn't proceeded since.
Original comment by richard.eckart
on 12 Nov 2014 at 10:08
this is broken: http://bulba.sdsu.edu/jeanette/thesis/PennTags.html
used instead:
http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~dm/07/autumn/795.10/ptb-annotation-guide/root.h
tml
Original comment by eckle.kohler
on 12 Nov 2014 at 10:26
better overview, less detail:
http://www.surdeanu.info/mihai/teaching/ista555-fall13/readings/PennTreebankCons
tituents.html
Original comment by eckle.kohler
on 12 Nov 2014 at 10:28
I reviewd the mapping.
The mapping is designed to loose information - which is due to incompatible
tagsets (Penn tagset not making distinctions that are present in Negra)
I think, Issue 516 (formerly issue 99) is not related because it is about
dependency types - this issue here is about constituent types.
Original comment by eckle.kohler
on 12 Nov 2014 at 1:21
Issue 517 is about dependencies.
Issue 516 is about constituents.
Although I might have made a bad job at separating the comments from issue 99
into the two new issues - there is also some overlap.
Original comment by richard.eckart
on 12 Nov 2014 at 2:20
This issue was updated by revision r3008.
- Added/changed 5 mappings based on expert-feedback from JEK
Original comment by richard.eckart
on 12 Nov 2014 at 2:42
I've just created a 1.7.x branch. Should r3008 be merged into it?
Original comment by pedrobss...@gmail.com
on 12 Nov 2014 at 2:48
Yes, please ;)
Original comment by richard.eckart
on 12 Nov 2014 at 4:42
Original comment by richard.eckart
on 12 Nov 2014 at 4:52
Original comment by pedrobss...@gmail.com
on 12 Nov 2014 at 4:57
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
richard.eckart
on 2 Oct 2014 at 2:41