Please provide an in-depth description of the question you have:
Volcano ensures that podgroups and pods share the same lifecycle through the Kubernetes owner reference mechanism. When there is an issue with my kube-manager component or a failure in the GC controller, it can result in pods being deleted while the podgroup remains. In such cases, the podgroup still reports scheduling failure events. Is this normal behavior? I expect that when there are no pods under a podgroup, scheduling failure events should not be reported.
What do you think about this question?:
Why are scheduling failure events still being reported for the PodGroup when there are no associated pod objects under it?
Please provide an in-depth description of the question you have: Volcano ensures that podgroups and pods share the same lifecycle through the Kubernetes owner reference mechanism. When there is an issue with my kube-manager component or a failure in the GC controller, it can result in pods being deleted while the podgroup remains. In such cases, the podgroup still reports scheduling failure events. Is this normal behavior? I expect that when there are no pods under a podgroup, scheduling failure events should not be reported.
What do you think about this question?: Why are scheduling failure events still being reported for the PodGroup when there are no associated pod objects under it?
Environment:
kubectl version
):uname -a
):