State of the field missing in JOSS paper

[ojeda-e]

The JOSS paper should include a comparison of openCADD-KLIFS to other commonly-used packages. Here are some questions that may help to add a couple of lines to the state of the field in your paper:

• Are there any other similar packages to openCADD-KLIFS? If yes, how is openCADD-KLIFS different?
• Is this package the open-source version of proprietary software?
• Is openCADD-KLIFS offering a unique solution to fetch data? Is openCADD-KLIFS the only automated package to fetch KLIFS data?
• How was the process of fetching KLIFS data before openCADD? How is the package making this process different/better/faster?

To fix this issue:

• [ ] Add a state of the field in the paper, where a comparison to other packages is offered to the reader.

REF: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3951

[dominiquesydow]

@ojeda-e thanks a lot for the pointers! My apologies for the delay on my end; I will have drafted an update by tomorrow.

[ojeda-e]

Thanks for letting me know @dominiquesydow. Can't wait to read the missing parts to finish the review! :)

[dominiquesydow]

Hi @ojeda-e,

Thanks again for your input on the manuscript! Please have a look at the revised version: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/3951#issuecomment-996179098

I have merged your comments with those from issue #133 in PR #135.