Closed alistaire47 closed 2 years ago
@austin3dickey The tests are failing here with diffs like
E - --run-name TEXT Name of run (commit, pull request, etc).
E ? ^ ---------------
E + --run-name TEXT Free-text name of run (commit ABC, pull
E ? ^^^^^^^^^^^ ++++
E + request 123, etc).
E + --run-reason TEXT Low-cardinality reason for run (commit, pull
E + request, manual, etc).
which I assume are from your conbench PR. Do you want to do a separate PR to adjust these, or should I fix them in this PR while I'm at it?
Do you want to do a separate PR to adjust these, or should I fix them in this PR while I'm at it?
You can fix them in this PR if it's the fastest way to unblock this.
...I'm not sure why there are so many tests that a help doc from a (non-pegged) dependency tool uses certain wording. Perhaps we shouldn't have those tests in the first place.
...I'm not sure why there are so many tests that a help doc from a (non-pegged) dependency tool uses certain wording. Perhaps we shouldn't have those tests in the first place.
Agreed. There are a lot of things in this package I'd like to clean up if there's time
I broke things with https://github.com/ursacomputing/arrowbench/pull/106 (specifically here) by changing a query name from
count_rows
todims
(because it checks number of cols in addition to rows). This PR makes the accompanying change in {benchmarks} so it will pass the right argument.