Linux metric reports suspiciously high value in comparison with Windows (10x times bigger).
It is absolutely OK (there are no errors in computation or smth), but it doesn't look useful at all and only attracts attention because of the difference with Windows.
It will probably be useful to reconsider this metric and look for a more useful one.
(But it doesn't mean that other metric exists and there is anything we can do about this difference)
Linux metric reports suspiciously high value in comparison with Windows (10x times bigger).
It is absolutely OK (there are no errors in computation or smth), but it doesn't look useful at all and only attracts attention because of the difference with Windows.
It will probably be useful to reconsider this metric and look for a more useful one. (But it doesn't mean that other metric exists and there is anything we can do about this difference)