after watching voters in MS cast ballots and being confused by 1) the undervote warning and then 2) the undervote cast as-is double confirm, I want to raise the question — do we think the double confirmation for casting-as-is is necessary/important for second chance voting warnings?
we’ve had it this way in the product for a long time and haven’t questioned it. but we also haven’t had voters experience casting-as-is functions in NH (due to the NH overvote rule) and my experience watching voters this week in MS makes me feel like it goes against voter experience expectations. it also just makes the process of casting in these cases slower.
after watching voters in MS cast ballots and being confused by 1) the undervote warning and then 2) the undervote cast as-is double confirm, I want to raise the question — do we think the double confirmation for casting-as-is is necessary/important for second chance voting warnings?
we’ve had it this way in the product for a long time and haven’t questioned it. but we also haven’t had voters experience casting-as-is functions in NH (due to the NH overvote rule) and my experience watching voters this week in MS makes me feel like it goes against voter experience expectations. it also just makes the process of casting in these cases slower.
!subteam^S05828MAZPV in particular for thoughts.
Issue automatically created from Slack feedback reported by roe: https://votingworks.slack.com/archives/CJU9MSC6S/p1731101530044379?thread_ts=1731101530.044379&cid=CJU9MSC6S