Open mdehollander opened 4 years ago
I also noticed this, and wonder why? Wouldn't complex metagenomes benefit from a higher --min-count
setting? Or is this not as straightforward, because complex metagenomes might contain both organisms that are present at very high coverage and at low coverage?
The preset meta-large uses the option
--min-count 1
, in contrast to the default--min-count 2
: https://github.com/voutcn/megahit/blob/36f5d4543bddc887b26e6bd42d722c9aaefac10b/src/megahit#L500This is not mentioned in the help message: https://github.com/voutcn/megahit/blob/36f5d4543bddc887b26e6bd42d722c9aaefac10b/src/megahit#L81