search

voxeltycoon / issues

18 stars 4 forks source link

three seperate railways, one signal block #896

Closed dumbbumb228 closed 2 years ago

dumbbumb228 commented 3 years ago

Describe the bug three completely separate signal blocks count as the one and works as the one. three different railways 1 signal block, 20210906204543_1

Steps to reproduce that just happened

Build version 0.86.1.0 Steam

Platform Windows 8.1

Reproducibility happened and can't be fixed

Logs/saves f6yytisza26.zip

DanielBarreleiro commented 3 years ago

Which block are you talking about? This one? image The tracks are too close on that turn, this has been pointed out many times. Train will crash if there's another train on the other side.

dumbbumb228 commented 3 years ago

Which block are you talking about? This one? image The tracks are too close on that turn, this has been pointed out many times. Train will crash if there's another train on the other side.

i suspected this, so i tried to move it away or break it down completely. Nothing changed

DanielBarreleiro commented 2 years ago

i suspected this, so i tried to move it away or break it down completely. Nothing changed

Here, like I said, move it a bit further away. image

victorleblais commented 2 years ago

As Daniel pointed out, the problem was that the tracks are too close for trains to cross each others

Roanmh commented 2 years ago

Hi, sorry to drag up a closed issue. I just want to mention that the same thing happened to me.

It's not obvious that trains would crash in this situation, which makes it very hard to see why the blocks are combined. I wonder if a UI improvement could make this situation (and the resolution) more obvious. Thanks!

dumbbumb228 commented 2 years ago

Hi, sorry to drag up a closed issue. I just want to mention that the same thing happened to me.

It's not obvious that trains would crash in this situation, which makes it very hard to see why the blocks are combined. I wonder if a UI improvement could make this situation (and the resolution) more obvious. Thanks!

i agree