Closed raphink closed 4 years ago
I wouldn't say it's backwards incompatible @bastelfreak, I'd say it's a bugfix, as it makes no sense to ignore remote_branch
in the PR when it's provided, and the behavior is unchanged when remote_branch
is not specified.
@ekohl any comment on that, or shall I merge?
When
remote_branch
is specified, the PR/MR should be opened against it, not the source branch.